Compare-Cities.com
Compare Alameda to Baldwin Park
This post compares Alameda, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Alameda (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,246 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $71,080 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $729,100 | $357,500 |
| White | 48% | 34% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 31% | 18% |
| With Kids | 31% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 53% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Alameda or Baldwin Park?
A: Alameda has a similar population count than Baldwin Park: 78246 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Alameda or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Alameda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Alameda or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Alameda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Alameda versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Alameda may include: South-Pasadena, Torrance, and San-Bruno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z