Compare-Cities.com
Compare Agoura Hills to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Agoura Hills, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Agoura Hills (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,736 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $80,143 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $745,000 | $374,600 |
| White | 82% | 81% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 8% | 3% |
| With Kids | 36% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 44 | 38 |
| Rentals | 25% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Agoura Hills or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Agoura Hills has a similar population count than South Lake Tahoe: 20736 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Agoura Hills or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Agoura Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Agoura Hills or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Agoura Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for Agoura Hills versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Agoura Hills may include: Mission-Viejo, Thousand-Oaks, and Laguna-Niguel.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z