Compare-Cities.com
Compare Yuma to Fortuna Foothills
This post compares Yuma, Arizona to Fortuna Foothills, Arizona across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Yuma (city) | Fortuna Foothills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,851 | 28,200 |
| Income (median) | $36,998 | $46,108 |
| Home Value (median) | $126,400 | $122,000 |
| White | 70% | 84% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 1% |
| With Kids | 41% | 17% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 60 |
| Rentals | 40% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Yuma or Fortuna Foothills?
A: Yuma has a larger population count than Fortuna Foothills: 93851 compared with 28200 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Yuma or in Fortuna Foothills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Yuma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Yuma or Fortuna Foothills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Yuma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Yuma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Yuma versus 19% for Fortuna Foothills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Yuma may include: Casa-Grande, Drexel-Heights, and El-Mirage.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z