Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Tan Valley to Fortuna Foothills
This post compares San Tan Valley, Arizona to Fortuna Foothills, Arizona across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Tan Valley (CDP) | Fortuna Foothills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 90,665 | 28,200 |
| Income (median) | $43,378 | $46,108 |
| Home Value (median) | $179,700 | $122,000 |
| White | 84% | 84% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 1% |
| With Kids | 44% | 17% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 60 |
| Rentals | 27% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Tan Valley or Fortuna Foothills?
A: San Tan Valley has a larger population count than Fortuna Foothills: 90665 compared with 28200 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Tan Valley or in Fortuna Foothills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Tan Valley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Tan Valley or Fortuna Foothills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Tan Valley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Tan Valley does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 27% for San Tan Valley versus 19% for Fortuna Foothills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Tan Valley may include: Sahuarita, Surprise, and Peoria.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z