Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kingman to Fortuna Foothills
This post compares Kingman, Arizona to Fortuna Foothills, Arizona across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kingman (city) | Fortuna Foothills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,855 | 28,200 |
| Income (median) | $41,486 | $46,108 |
| Home Value (median) | $127,900 | $122,000 |
| White | 88% | 84% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 1% |
| With Kids | 28% | 17% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 60 |
| Rentals | 34% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kingman or Fortuna Foothills?
A: Kingman has a similar population count than Fortuna Foothills: 28855 compared with 28200 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kingman or in Fortuna Foothills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Kingman.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kingman or Fortuna Foothills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Kingman.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kingman does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Kingman versus 19% for Fortuna Foothills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kingman may include: Prescott-Valley, Casas-Adobes, and Apache-Junction.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z