Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kingman to Catalina Foothills
This post compares Kingman, Arizona to Catalina Foothills, Arizona across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kingman (city) | Catalina Foothills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,855 | 50,202 |
| Income (median) | $41,486 | $71,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $127,900 | $410,200 |
| White | 88% | 87% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 5% |
| With Kids | 28% | 20% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 53 |
| Rentals | 34% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kingman or Catalina Foothills?
A: Kingman has a smaller population count than Catalina Foothills: 28855 compared with 50202 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kingman or in Catalina Foothills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Kingman.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kingman or Catalina Foothills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Kingman.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kingman does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Kingman versus 25% for Catalina Foothills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kingman may include: Prescott-Valley, Casas-Adobes, and Apache-Junction.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z