Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Fortuna Foothills
This post compares Glendale, Arizona to Fortuna Foothills, Arizona across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | Fortuna Foothills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 241,543 | 28,200 |
| Income (median) | $39,170 | $46,108 |
| Home Value (median) | $180,500 | $122,000 |
| White | 78% | 84% |
| Black | 6% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 1% |
| With Kids | 36% | 17% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 60 |
| Rentals | 45% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Fortuna Foothills?
A: Glendale has a much larger population count than Fortuna Foothills: 241543 compared with 28200 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Fortuna Foothills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Fortuna Foothills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Glendale versus 19% for Fortuna Foothills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Sierra-Vista, Tucson, and Avondale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z