Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fortuna Foothills to San Tan Valley
This post compares Fortuna Foothills, Arizona to San Tan Valley, Arizona across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fortuna Foothills (CDP) | San Tan Valley (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,200 | 90,665 |
| Income (median) | $46,108 | $43,378 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,000 | $179,700 |
| White | 84% | 84% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 1% | 2% |
| With Kids | 17% | 44% |
| Age (median) | 60 | 32 |
| Rentals | 19% | 27% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fortuna Foothills or San Tan Valley?
A: Fortuna Foothills has a much smaller population count than San Tan Valley: 28200 compared with 90665 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fortuna Foothills or in San Tan Valley?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Fortuna Foothills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fortuna Foothills or San Tan Valley?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Fortuna Foothills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Tan Valley does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 19% for Fortuna Foothills versus 27% for San Tan Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fortuna Foothills may include: Apache-Junction, Sun-City, and Lake-Havasu-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z