Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fortuna Foothills to Kingman
This post compares Fortuna Foothills, Arizona to Kingman, Arizona across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fortuna Foothills (CDP) | Kingman (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,200 | 28,855 |
| Income (median) | $46,108 | $41,486 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,000 | $127,900 |
| White | 84% | 88% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 1% |
| With Kids | 17% | 28% |
| Age (median) | 60 | 41 |
| Rentals | 19% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fortuna Foothills or Kingman?
A: Fortuna Foothills has a similar population count than Kingman: 28200 compared with 28855 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fortuna Foothills or in Kingman?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Fortuna Foothills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fortuna Foothills or Kingman?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Fortuna Foothills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kingman does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 19% for Fortuna Foothills versus 34% for Kingman.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fortuna Foothills may include: Apache-Junction, Sun-City, and Lake-Havasu-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z