Compare-Cities.com
Compare Catalina Foothills to Kingman
This post compares Catalina Foothills, Arizona to Kingman, Arizona across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Catalina Foothills (CDP) | Kingman (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,202 | 28,855 |
| Income (median) | $71,980 | $41,486 |
| Home Value (median) | $410,200 | $127,900 |
| White | 87% | 88% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 5% | 1% |
| With Kids | 20% | 28% |
| Age (median) | 53 | 41 |
| Rentals | 25% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Catalina Foothills or Kingman?
A: Catalina Foothills has a larger population count than Kingman: 50202 compared with 28855 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Catalina Foothills or in Kingman?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Catalina Foothills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Catalina Foothills or Kingman?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Catalina Foothills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kingman does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for Catalina Foothills versus 34% for Kingman.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Catalina Foothills may include: Scottsdale, Oro-Valley, and Fountain-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z