Compare-Cities.com
Compare Buckeye to Fortuna Foothills
This post compares Buckeye, Arizona to Fortuna Foothills, Arizona across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Buckeye (city) | Fortuna Foothills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,090 | 28,200 |
| Income (median) | $40,922 | $46,108 |
| Home Value (median) | $182,100 | $122,000 |
| White | 76% | 84% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 1% |
| With Kids | 47% | 17% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 60 |
| Rentals | 31% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Buckeye or Fortuna Foothills?
A: Buckeye has a larger population count than Fortuna Foothills: 62090 compared with 28200 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Buckeye or in Fortuna Foothills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Buckeye.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Buckeye or Fortuna Foothills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Buckeye.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Buckeye does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 31% for Buckeye versus 19% for Fortuna Foothills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Buckeye may include: El-Mirage, San-Tan-Valley, and Avondale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z