Compare-Cities.com
Compare Little Rock to Russellville
This post compares Little Rock, Arkansas to Russellville, Arkansas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Little Rock (city) | Russellville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 197,780 | 29,147 |
| Income (median) | $41,769 | $30,421 |
| Home Value (median) | $159,900 | $136,900 |
| White | 50% | 86% |
| Black | 41% | 5% |
| Asian | 3% | 1% |
| With Kids | 28% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 27 |
| Rentals | 43% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Little Rock or Russellville?
A: Little Rock has a much larger population count than Russellville: 197780 compared with 29147 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Little Rock or in Russellville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Little Rock.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Little Rock or Russellville?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Little Rock.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Russellville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Little Rock versus 53% for Russellville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Little Rock may include: North-Little-Rock, Jonesboro, and Fort-Smith.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z